Legal Opinion

State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1951No. 32250PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

The first question to be considered is whether the action, which it is alleged that Western Union proposes to take with regard to its service in these communities, can be taken without first securing the approval of the commission. The answer to this question depends upon an analysis of the allegations of the pleadings and the terms of Sections 504-2 and 504-3, General Code.

So far as material to a consideration of the questions involved in this case, those sections read as follows :

“Section 504-2. * * * no public utility * * * furnishing service or facilities within the state of Ohio, shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuller v. DrenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cox v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Board of Education v. Brunswick Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. City of Bedford Heights v. TallaricoOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Nelson v. Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API