Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Drenberg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1965No. 39098PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeens, J.

At the outset, and in view of the arguments of counsel, it should be stated with particularity that the single issue presented in this case is one of pleading: Whether the plaintiffs’ second amended petition states a cause of action.

Although but one recovery is sought in the case, the plaintiffs have alleged three separate and distinct causes of action. The first cause of action seeks relief for breach of warranty; the second cause of action seeks rescission for mutual mistake; and the third cause of action proceeds upon the alternative theory of fraud.

It is fundamental that a general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kleinberg v. RatettNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Bullis v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Stanfield v. SchneidewindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  5. Voytecek v. Peoples Savings Bank Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dartron Corp. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  2. 37 Robinwood Associates v. Health Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Endersby v. SchneppeOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Cook v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Suermondt v. LoweOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API