Legal Opinion
Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Lilli Ann Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 9, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4568, 69 Civ. 1683PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant Lilli Ann Corporation moves pursuant to Rules 12(b) (2), (3) and (5) of .the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order dismissing the actions instituted against it by plaintiffs Sidney Ellis Associates, Inc. and Manchester Modes, Inc., 1 on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, improper venue 2 and insufficiency of service of process.
Plaintiff Manchester Modes, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Manchester”) is incorporated under the laws of the State of Connecticut and is not licensed to do business in the State of New York. In its suit against…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bryant v. Finnish National AirlineNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. Abraham AltusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Landoil Resources Corp. v. Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Top Form Mills, Inc. v. Sociedad Nationale Industria Applicazioni ViscosaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v. Charles Schmitt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Stark Carpet Corporation v. M-Geough Robinson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.