Legal Opinion
Engle v. City of Oroville
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1965No. Civ. 10883PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
By its judgment after a bifurcated trial the trial court (1) permanently enjoined defendant city from “discharging sewage effluent from the sewage plant of the City of Oroville into the Feather River,” and (2) awarded plaintiffs damages of $11,000. The first phase (in which plaintiffs’ right to injunctive relief was decided) was tried by the court. The issue of damages was. determined (in the second phase) by a jury after an abortive appeal to this court on plaintiffs’ right to an injunction had been dismissed as premature.
Defendant urges a number of assignments of error, only two of which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.