Legal Opinion
In Re Padilla
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 2007No. 15-14720PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERIC L. FRANK, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In many chapter 13 bankruptcy cases, the ongoing, postpetition relationship between the debtor and the holder of a residential mortgage determines whether the debtor will be successful in achieving the financial rehabilitation sought in the case. A common, if not the most common, chapter 13 plan proposed is one requiring that a debtor make two types of ongoing payments to reinstate a delinquent mortgage: (1) periodic payments to the chapter 13 trustee over the time period of the chapter 13 plan in amount sufficient to cure a…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re JanssenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re HeinzleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
- In Re RedmondUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- In Re DominiqueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.