Legal Opinion

Till v. SCS Credit Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 17, 2004No. 02-1016PublishedCited by 391 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Stevens

To qualify for court approval under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, an individual debtor’s proposed debt adjustment plan must accommodate each allowed, secured creditor in one of three ways: (1) by obtaining the creditor’s acceptance of the plan; (2) by surrendering the property securing the claim; or (3) by providing the creditor both a lien securing the claim and a promise of future property distributions (such as deferred cash payments) whose total “value, as of the effective date of the plan, ... is not less than the allowed amount of such claim.”1 The third alternative is *469commonly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re: Lee M. Till and Amy M. Till, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

3Cited by391 opinions

  1. In Re Lehman Bros. Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Airadigm Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re WrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. In Re: American Homepatient, Inc., Debtor. Bank of Montreal, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Momentive Performance Materials Inc. v. BOKF, NACourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

386 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API