Legal Opinion
Hannon v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 19, 1993No. 91-1334CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*143 OPINION
HORN, Judge.
This ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to partially dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (4) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).1 Defendant alleges that plaintiffs are not entitled to “claims for Administratively Uncontrollable Overtime (“AUO”) because they have no statutory right to AUO, have not alleged a money-mandating statute entitling them to lodge jurisdiction in this court, have not made a claim for money from…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Doe, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Schweiger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Mercier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.