Legal Opinion

Hotz Ex Rel. Shareholders of Minyard-Waidner, Inc. v. Minyard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1991No. 23377PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

This appeal is from an order granting respondents summary judgment on several causes of action. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Respondent Minyard (Tommy) and appellant (Judy) are brother and sister. Their father, Mr. Minyard, owns two automobile dealerships, Judson T. Minyard, Inc. (Greenville Dealership), and Minyard-Waidner, Inc. (Anderson Dealership). Tommy has been the dealer in charge of the Greenville Dealership since 1977. Judy worked for her father at the Anderson Dealership beginning in 1988; she was also a vice-president and minority shareholder. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Island Car Wash, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Wagner v. BiscoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. In the Matter of GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. Clemson UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Spence v. WingateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Pittman v. Grand Strand Entertainment, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Hendricks v. Clemson UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API