Legal Opinion
Butler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 8, 2004No. A119393PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that denied him re-release after the revocation of his parole. Petitioner raises several assignments of error. We write only to address his assertion that ORS 144.005(1) and OAR 255-075-0096, a statute and board rule that became effective after he committed the crimes for which he was originally convicted, violate the ex post facto provisions of the Oregon and United States constitutions. That statute and rule authorized the denial of his re-release by majority decision of a three-person board, rather than…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morrison v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. Vazquez-EscobarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Wrenn v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.