Legal Opinion

Wrenn v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2009No. 08-35223Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jerry Jay Wrenn (Wrenn) appeals the denial of his habeas petition. In denying Wrenn’s ex post facto claim, the Oregon Court of Appeals relied on Butler v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 194 Or.App. 164, 94 P.3d 149 (2004). Butler held that the modifications to the re-release voting procedure were procedural changes that created only a speculative risk of increased punishment. Id. at 153-54. This decision was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of Cal. Dep’t of Corr. v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499, 115 S.Ct. 1597, 131 L.Ed.2d 588 (1995). See id. at 509, 115…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Butler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API