Legal Opinion

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1988No. Civ. 870205PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Bert-hold Reservation [TAT] appealed from a district court judgment dismissing its action against Wold Engineering, P.C. [Wold]. We affirm.

In 1973 TAT contracted with Wold for the design and construction of a year-round water system for the Four Bears Village on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. Wold designed an above-the-ground “wet” system, and after the Indian Health Services, a division of the Federal government, reviewed, revised, and approved the plans, the system was installed and became operational in the fall of 1977.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Estate of ElmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bottineau Farmers Elevator v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Rawlings v. FruhwirthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Jilek v. Berger Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Butler v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API