Legal Opinion
Jilek v. Berger Electric, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1989No. Civ. 880375PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Wayne Jilek and Diane Jilek appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Berger Electric, Inc. Because we hold that NDCC § 28-01-18(3) (two-year statute of limitations) does not apply to electricians, we reverse and remand.
The Jileks commenced suit against Berger Electric on June 27, 1986, alleging that the electrical heating system which Berger Electric planned, constructed and installed in the Jeliks’ home in 1980 caused substan tial property damage. The Jileks alleged that they relied on the expertise and experience of Berger Electric and that by failing to plan and install a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. HauglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. LawsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Aanenson v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Hocking Conservancy District v. Dodson-Lindblom Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Bottineau Farmers Elevator v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Rawlings v. FruhwirthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Ron Krein and Jeanne Krein v. Dba CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.