Legal Opinion

Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1984No. 82-629PublishedCited by 278 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

This litigation presents issues of state-court civil jurisdiction over a claim asserted by an Indian tribe. The case, as it comes to us, is somewhat unusual in a central respect: the Tribe seeks, rather than contests, state-court jurisdiction, and the non-Indian party is in opposition. Cf. Williams v. Lee, 358 U. S. 217 (1959).

Chapter 27-19 of the North Dakota Century Code (1974) is entitled “Indian Civil Jurisdiction.” Section 27-19-01 of that

*141Code provides that the jurisdiction of North Dakota courts shall extend “over all civil causes of action which arise on an Indian reservation upon…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by278 opinions

  1. Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API