Fisher v. Fisher
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s determination, after remand, that a substantial change in circumstances was not contemplated. We previously addressed the plaintiff’s appeal from the granting of a motion for modification of a dissolution judgment in Fisher v. Fisher, 25 Conn. App. 82, 592 A.2d 968, cert. denied, 220 Conn. 917, 597 A.2d 333 (1991). We remanded the case to the trial court to determine whether the substantial change in circumstances found by the court was not contemplated by the parties at the time of dissolution. We did so under the authority of Darak v. Darak, 210…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hartford Principals' & Supervisors' Ass'n v. SheddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. HuntleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dealmeida v. M.C.M. Stamping Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Misinonile v. MisinonileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Fisher v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Misinonile v. MisinonileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994