Legal Opinion · Dissent

Misinonile v. Misinonile

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 26, 1994No. 12581Published

1DissentLandau, J.

I agree with the majority that a reasonable basis exists in the facts as to a substantial change of circumstances to permit the trial court to entertain the motion for modification; I do not agree with the majority that the trial court was correct when it reduced the alimony award from $175 per week to $100 per week. 1

The trial court has broad discretion in domestic relations cases and review is limited to whether the court’s conclusions were correct in law and reasonably reached on the basis of the evidence presented. Cattaneo v. Cattaneo, 19 Conn. App. 161, 166, 561 A.2d 967 (1989). This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Burke v. AvitabileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Paddock v. PaddockConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API