Legal Opinion
Cerrato v. Durham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 16, 1996No. 95 Civ. 6456 (LAP)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PRESKA, District Judge:
This is an action alleging employment discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Executive Health Group National Health Services (“EHG”) through its agents, defendant Carol Durham (“Durham”) and defendant Cathy Heslin (“Heslin”), terminated her employment on the basis of her sex and pregnancy-related disabilities in violation of the following statutes: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1995) (“Title VII”), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Navarro Pomares v. Pfizer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Spees v. James Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Serednyj v. Beverly Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Hernandez v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.