Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Sproul

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1908No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Timothy Kelly, administrator of the estate of Patrick Kelly, deceased, against Robert Sproul for money paid. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The finding of facts in this case shows that in 1893, Anna A. Grady was complainant, and Frank T. Warrell defendant, in summary proceedings then pending in the circuit court for Kent county. Being defeated, complainant Grady removed the cause to this court, filing the statutory bond required in such cases, dated November 18, 1893. Patrick Kelly and the defendant in this action were her sureties upon the bond. The judgment was affirmed (Grady v. Warrell, 105 Mich. 310) and a judgment for costs against Grady was entered in *692this court on May 21, 1895, and a few days later costs were taxed, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grady v. WarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Sziber v. StoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bell v. MortonIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Board of County Road Commissioners of the County of Wayne v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  5. Rice v. SnowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API