Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Wakefield

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1940No. Civ. 2533PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to fourteen shares of the capital stock of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company.

Daisy Bernhauer and Velma Stacey were mother and daughter. Daisy died on December 5, 1935, and Velma in February, 1936. C. K. Wakefield was appointed administrator of both estates. Counsel have expressly waived the question of the propriety of C. K. Wakefield as administrator of the estate of Velma Stacey, deceased, suing himself as the administrator of the estate of Daisy Bernhauer, deceased. We express no opinion on that question but merely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Tobola v. WholetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Gray v. GrayIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API