Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Pitz v. City of Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1988No. 87AP-1225PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.

Plaintiff, Fred Pitz, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raises six assignments of error as follows:

“1. The trial court erred in refusing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to plaintiff’s first cause of action as requested by the plaintiff-appellant.

‘ ‘2. The trial court erred in failing to grant the writ of mandamus prayed for by the plaintiff-appellant in the first count of his amended complaint requiring the defendant-appellee to issue the building permit applied for in 1985.

“3. The trial court erred in failing to find, as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Blausey v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Crestmont Cleveland Partnership v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State ex rel. BSW Dev. Group v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. OTR v. ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mehta v. Ohio UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API