Legal Opinion

State ex rel. OTR v. Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1996No. 1995-0611PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 203.] THE STATE EX REL. OTR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. OTR v. Columbus,

1996-Ohio-411.] Real property—Owner of property abutting highway has right of access to street it abuts—Any governmental action that substantially and unreasonably interferes with this right constitutes a taking of private property within meaning of Section 19, Article I of Ohio Constitution and Fifth Amendment to United States Constitution. __________________ An owner of a parcel of real…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State ex rel. OTR v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Norwood v. Forest Converting Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Pitz v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coles v. GranvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. BSW Dev. Group v. DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Elsass v. Shelby Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. New Wen, Inc. v. Marchbanks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API