Legal Opinion

Holgate v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 36,781PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover damages alleged to have been caused by injuries claimed to have been suffered by him by reason of the negligence of the defendants. At the conclusion of the testimony of the plaintiff, and upon motion of each of the defendants made separately, the trial court directed a verdict for each of the defendants. A motion for new trial was made and denied, and plaintiff brings the case here by appeal in the nature of a writ of error.

In the consideration of the case, the court having directed a verdict in favor of each of the defendants, the testimony is to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Holbrook v. Olympia Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ryland v. Harve M. Wheeler Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Thompson v. Essex Wire Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Star Steel Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Ryan v. Twin City Wholesale Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Sheathelm v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API