Legal Opinion

Sheathelm v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1937No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 39,082PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of defendant, Consumers Power Company. Plaintiff, a minor, was injured in a highway collision between a car driven by his father in which he was riding and one owned by the defendant company, which was being driven by defendant Russell O’Neil, its employee. The action against Consumers Power Company is based upon 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 1618. This section reads in part:

“The owner (of a motor vehicle) shall not be liable, however, unless said motor vehicle is being driven with his or her express or implied consent or knowledge.”

Since none of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Rogers v. Saginaw-Bay City Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Noonan v. VolekMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Stone v. Sinclair Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Holtz v. L. J. Beal & Son, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rickert v. Travelers Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. People v. FitzsimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Rabaut v. Ford Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API