Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Brooks Street Associates
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 30, 1988No. 13338PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The plaintiff Carol Steinberg has filed this appeal from an order of the Superior Court granting the defendants’ motions to discharge two notices of lis pendens filed by the plaintiffs against real estate owned by the defendants at 672-704 and 720-738 Brooks Street, Bridgeport. The court held that the plaintiffs had failed to prove that there was “probable *17cause to sustain the validity of [their] claim” under the Common Interest Ownership Act (CIOA); see General Statutes § 47-282 et seq.; as required by General Statutes § 52-325b (b).1 The issue raised by the plaintiff on appeal is whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Sadlowski v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Harkins v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Heck v. AdamsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gagnon v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Corsino v. TelescaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Vossbrinck v. Eckert Seamans Cherin, & Mellott, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.