Legal Opinion

Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 1979No. 6023PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Appellant Toyota as plaintiff sued appel-lee Griffin for $250 alleged to be balance due on an automobile purchased by Griffin from Toyota.

Griffin answered by general denial and filed cross action against Toyota under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act seeking $527.50 damages for denial of use of his automobile; $2500 damages to his credit reputation; prayed that both items be trebled ($527.50 + $2500 = $3027.50 X 3 = $9082.50); plus $1500 attorneys’ fees.

At the conclusion of the evidence Toyota filed motion to dismiss Griffin’s cross action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Williams v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Regian v. SowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Mumme v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Pennant Oil & Gas Co. v. LightfootTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Picon Transportation, Inc. v. Pomerantz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Picon Transportation, Inc. v. Pomerantz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. Thuy Sunosky v. Allen A. Rad Law Firm, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API