Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Appellant Toyota as plaintiff sued appel-lee Griffin for $250 alleged to be balance due on an automobile purchased by Griffin from Toyota.
Griffin answered by general denial and filed cross action against Toyota under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act seeking $527.50 damages for denial of use of his automobile; $2500 damages to his credit reputation; prayed that both items be trebled ($527.50 + $2500 = $3027.50 X 3 = $9082.50); plus $1500 attorneys’ fees.
At the conclusion of the evidence Toyota filed motion to dismiss Griffin’s cross action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Williams v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Regian v. SowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Mumme v. SpiesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Pennant Oil & Gas Co. v. LightfootTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Picon Transportation, Inc. v. Pomerantz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Picon Transportation, Inc. v. Pomerantz, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Thuy Sunosky v. Allen A. Rad Law Firm, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.