Legal Opinion · Dissent

Picon Transportation, Inc. v. Pomerantz

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 6, 1991No. 05-90-01366-CVPublished

1DissentBurnett, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority held that the trial court erred in rendering judgment in an amount in excess of jurisdictional limit. I conclude that the trial court never acquired subject matter jurisdiction over Pomerantz’s cause of action. Accordingly, I would dismiss the cause of action.

In his original petition, Pomerantz sought recovery of “not less than” $30,860 in actual damages, “not less than” $20,000 in exemplary damages, and “[p]re-judgment interest at the maximum legal rate from September 8, 1986, [the date of the accident] until judgment,” which totalled $50,860 exclusive of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Williams v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API