Legal Opinion
Clary Corp. v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 8, 1994No. 2-93-243-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATTIMORE, Justice.
This ease originated as a suit on an open account. Appellees Daniel Smith and Michael Smith, individually, and d/b/a Fairfield Distributors filed counterclaims seeking damages for deceptive trade practices, negligent misrepresentation, and tortious interference with business relations. Following a jury trial, judgment was rendered on the verdict for appellees in the net amount of $264,-270.61, after allowing for an offset on Clary Corporation’s open account claim. The dis-positive issue on appeal is whether all or a portion of the respective claims exceeded the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Richardson v. First National Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Haginas v. Malbis Memorial FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Kirk v. HeadTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Smith v. Clary Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Color Tile, Inc. v. Ramsey, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- David Matthew Prewett, Prewett Rentals Series 2752 Military LLC, Adrienne v. Prewett, Richard Coons, Jeannette Coons, Tami Jan, Ward Galbreath, Sumit Kapoor, Rachel Kapoor, Nakul Jeirath, Tasha Jeirath, Mark L. Reis, and Janis R. Reis v. Canyon Lake Island Property Owners Association, Sally W. Duncan and A. Baker Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019