Legal Opinion

Pennant Oil & Gas Co. v. Lightfoot

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1927No. 914-4680PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Defendant in error, R. P. Lightfoot, as plaintiff, instituted this suit in the county court of Tarrant county against plaintiff in error, alleging the facts constituting his cause of action as follows:

“Por cause of action plaintiff says that on or about the month of March, 1922, he was engaged in drilling an oil well near Cross Plains, Tex., and that the defendant borrowed from plaintiff 45 joints of 12%-inch casing, making 990 feet 6 inches, and also 1,950 feet 2 inches of 2-inch line pipe; that at the time said pipe was loaned by plaintiff to defendant it was expected that the same would be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pennybacker v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. Wischkaemper v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tejas Toyota, Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. United Finance Corp. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Manly v. Citizens Nat. Bank in AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Capital Oil & Gas Co. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API