Legal Opinion

Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1907No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by Samuel G. M. Gates against the Detroit & Mackinac Railway Company for breach of contract to transport certain logs. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract, made in August, 1899, to haul plaintiff’s logs and other forest products over a logging railroad constructed by the parties under the contract The contract was evidenced by certain letters written by defendant’s general superintendent and agreed to by the plaintiff, containing, among other provisions, the following:

“ We to haul your logs from town 25 north r^nge 4'and 5 east to North Bay City at the rate of $3.00 per thousand feet board measure, but nothing greater than 33^ to be deducted from any log for defects and a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGregor v. Estate of RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hazleton Coal Co. v. Buck Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Goldblum v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers Ford Local No. 50Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rosen v. TackettMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bunnell v. TraynorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Peerless Woolen Mills v. Chicago Garment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API