Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Tackett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1923No. Docket No. 120PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. Bill by Isaac Rosen against Lura B. Tackett to restrain an action of ejectment, and to-quiet title. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This action is brought to restrain the prosecution of an ejectment suit and to have the title to the property in controversy established in the plaintiff free from all claims of dower. On the 5th of February, 1920, Marion F. Tackett died intestate in the city of Muskegon. The property in question, known as the Tackett block, was a part of his estate. The defendant, who is the widow, and William C. Tackett, her son, were appointed administrators of the estate. As such, on the 11th day of June, 1920, they entered into a written contract for the sale of the Tackett block to Isaac Rosen, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gates v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dill v. WidmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Krueger v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Domby v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Kelley v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Krueger v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API