Legal Opinion

Estate of Firth

California Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1904No. S.F. No. 3700PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

While the estate of Joseph Bellamy Firth was in course of administration the court made an order setting apart to the surviving widow, Evelina L. Firth, a certain part of the real property of the estate as a homestead,—and also containing an adjudication about another matter which will be noticed hereafter. From this order Joseph K. Firth and Fanny Firth, heirs at law of the deceased and devisees under his will, appeal. They are adult children by a former marriage; he left no minor children.

The facts necessary to the determination of this appeal are these: All the property of the deceased was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of HuelsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sulzberger v. SulzbergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Rountree v. MontagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Estate of ClausseniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Barkley v. Banque Belge Pour L'EtrangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API