Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Dissent · MullarkeyChief Justice Mullarkey
The majority interprets the anti-rent-control statute section 38-12-8301, 10 CRS. (1999), very broadly. It applies that construction to preempt the Telluride ordinance, and it holds that such preemption is permissible under the constitutional home rule provision, article XX, section 6 of the Colorado Constitution. I respectfully dissent.
I
There is no sound authority for the majority's broad reading of the prohibition against rent control ordinances imposed by the state statute. To the contrary, the statute, its legislative history, and other legislative enactments support the conclusion that…
Also in this document: Dissent · Hobbs.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.