Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Grolsche Bierbrouwerij B.V.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 9, 1979No. Civ. B-76-344PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
DALY, District Judge.
This diversity action arises out of an alleged 1973 contract by which defendant Grolsche Bierbrouwerij B.V. (Grolsche), a Netherlands corporation, is alleged to have granted to plaintiff A. Hunter Bowman d/b/a American Sales Company (American) the exclusive right to develop and supply the United States market for Grolsche’s “Grolsch” beer products. Plaintiffs Grolsch-Michigan, Inc. (Grolsch-Michigan) and Groenlo Marketing, Inc. (Groenlo) are corporations formed by American to act as importer and promoter, respectively, of Grolsch…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Scott C. Savin v. Harry H. RanierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Visual Sciences, Inc. v. Integrated Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Ensign-Bickford Co. v. ICI EXPLOSIVES USA INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Bross Utilities Service Corp. v. AboubshaitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Teleco Oilfield Services, Inc. v. Skandia InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.