Legal Opinion

In re the Royal Bank

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

The Royal Bank of Canada has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b) and 45 (b) to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon it at the instance of the United States. The Bank claims that the subpoena was issued “without proper authority” and is not a valid process of this court as there is no action pending in connection with which a subpoena could properly be issued. Alternatively, the Bank moves this court pursuant to 26(b), 30(b) and 45(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. to modify and limit the scope of the subpoena upon the grounds that it seeks an examination into matters which are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Osborne v. MalloryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Chester Lee Mohler v. Earl Miller, Orville Phillippe, John Truchly, Joseph Brown and Peppino PuleoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Gloster v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Newberg v. American Dryer CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gleason v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. In Re Chaus Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. E & C Trading Ltd. (In Re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. GLEASON v. McBRIDECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API