Garza v. Webb County
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
J. SCOTT HACKER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Leave and Request for Approval of Rule 29 Agreement.” (Dkt. No. 56). Through this motion, Plaintiffs seek approval of the parties’ agreement to conduct the depositions of Defendants Esteban Paez and Juan Enrique Villarreal on January 9, 2014. (See id., Attach. 1; see also Dkt. No. 57). Of note, this date falls outside the court-ordered deadline of January 3, 2014 to complete discovery. (See Dkt. No. 49 at 5). For the following reasons, the Court will approve the parties’ Rule 29…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Hernandez v. Mario's Auto Sales, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Caribbean Const. Corp. v. Kennedy Van Saun Mfg. & Eng. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Olgyay v. Society for Environmental Graphic Design, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Chiropractic Alliance v. ParisiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
3Cited by15 opinions
- BalanceCXI, Inc. v. International Consulting & Research Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
- Baqer v. St. Tammany Parish GovernmentDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Bracamontes v. GeoVera Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
- Cockburn v. Apex Oil Company IncDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Corbeille v. Harrah's New Orleans, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.