Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 26, 1987No. 17456-8-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ringold, A.C.J.

Pamela Jo Raymond sued her paternal grandparents, Aaron and Huida Ingram, alleging that Aaron sexually abused her when she was a child and that Huida negligently allowed the abuse to occur. The trial court granted the Ingrams' motion for summary judgment, dismissing claims for any acts that occurred prior to October 24, 1981, because the statute of limitations had run. Raymond appeals, and we affirm.

Raymond alleged that when she was between the ages of 4 and 17, Aaron Ingram sexually abused her, with the knowledge and consent of Huida Ingram. Several experts affied that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glass v. Stahl Specialty CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Steele v. Organon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Ashley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Markley v. MarkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. C.J.C. v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Petersen v. BruenNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Green v. A.P.C.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ew v. DchMontana Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API