Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carey v. De Rose

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 40,034Published

1DissentSharpe, J.

Plaintiff, Pauline Carey, brought this action as administratrix of the estate of her husband, James W. Carey, deceased, to recover damages under the survival act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §14040 [Stat. Ann. § 27.684]) for death of deceased resulting from an automobile collision at an intersection of a country highway in Kent county and M-114 on October 9, 1935, at about 4:30 p. m.

Pauline Carey, driving a 1930 Ford coupe, was traveling in a northerly direction on a gravel road 18 feet wide which intersects at right angles with M-114, another gravel road 30 to 35 feet wide. Mrs. Carey and her stepson…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bugbee v. FowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Adams v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Thompson v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Frary v. Grand Rapids Taxicab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Pulford v. MouwMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API