Adams v. Canfield
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
The question is whether the court properly directed a verdict for defendant, on the ground of contributory negligence of plaintiff, in an action arising out of a collision of automobiles.
In the afternoon of a stormy, snowy, blustery day in January, plaintiff was riding in a car driven by he.r nephew, Wesley Wilkinson, going west on a gravel road in Kent county. They came to the Belt Line, a through highway paved with cement 20 feet wide, and stopped 5 feet from the pavement. They looked both to the right and left and saw no car approaching on the Belt Line. • They could see about 180 feet.…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Lynch v. Pee Dee Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Zarzecki v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.