Legal Opinion

Adams v. Canfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1933No. Docket No. 53, Calendar No. 36,951PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The question is whether the court properly directed a verdict for defendant, on the ground of contributory negligence of plaintiff, in an action arising out of a collision of automobiles.

In the afternoon of a stormy, snowy, blustery day in January, plaintiff was riding in a car driven by he.r nephew, Wesley Wilkinson, going west on a gravel road in Kent county. They came to the Belt Line, a through highway paved with cement 20 feet wide, and stopped 5 feet from the pavement. They looked both to the right and left and saw no car approaching on the Belt Line. • They could see about 180 feet.…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lynch v. Pee Dee Express, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Thompson v. Michigan Cab Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Zarzecki v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API