Legal Opinion

SMP II Ltd. Partnership v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 5, 1996No. 1 CA-TX 95-0005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

Maricopa County and the Arizona Department of Revenue (“appellants”) appeal from a tax court judgment reducing the 1992 full cash value of the Sheraton San Marcos Resort to $6,780,000. Appellants also appeal from the tax court’s order denying their motion for new trial. SMP II Limited Partnership (“taxpayer”) cross-appeals from the tax court’s ruling that its expert witness costs were part of the total sum subject to the $20,000 cap imposed by Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 12-348(E)(5) (1992).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Taxpayer owns the San Marcos…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. State v. SchonerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. BallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Magellan South Mountain Ltd. Partnership v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. AIDA RENTA TRUST v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. 100 Val Vista/Montgomery LLC v. Pinal Cnty.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API