State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Ordinarily, we do not write opinions on motions for rehearing, but, because the original opinion laid down certain rules important for the guidance of the tax-assessing authorities of the state, and because of the apparent failure of counsel for appellants to understand, both what we decided, and why we decided it, we depart from our usual custom.
The precise point in the opinion with which appellants seem to take issue is that we stated that in a suit by a taxpayer to correct an assessment £ £ the trial court is limited in determining the true value to evidence which was in existence at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Kirby v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- People ex rel. Murray v. City of St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Washington Union Coal Co. v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by11 opinions
- Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- SMP II Ltd. Partnership v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Black v. Teton County Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- State Tax Commission v. Eagle Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
- State Tax Commission v. Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.