Legal Opinion
State v. Schoner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 27, 1979No. 1 CA-CR 3105PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Judge.
Appellants, Steven Ronald Schoner and Steven Greg Twitchell, challenged the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 13-374 as impinging upon their First Amendment rights, and on these grounds seek to have their convictions for willful disturbance of a public school or school meeting set aside. The statute reads:
“A person who wilfully disturbs a public school or school meeting is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than fifty nor more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not to exceed three months.”
The facts pertinent to this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Healy v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Walls v. Arizona Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. FendlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. LycettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.