Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 24, 2012No. 10-1042PublishedCited by 160 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
A provision of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), codified at 12 U. S. C. § 2607(b), prohibits giving and accepting “any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service . . . other than for services actually performed.” We consider whether, to establish a violation of § 2607(b), 1 a plaintiff must demonstrate that a charge was divided between two or more persons.
rH
Enacted in 1974, RE SPA regulates the market for real estate “settlement services,” a term defined by statute to include “any service provided in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- James Latiolais v. Eagle, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement FundSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Roth v. CitiMortgage Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Navy Federal Credit Union v. LTD Financial Services, LPCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.