Goldings v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, J.
Before the court is the government’s motion to dismiss the complaint filed by the plaintiff, Morris M. Goldings. In his complaint, Mr. Goldings alleges that the United States Postal Service breached an “implied contract for a reward” to pay him for information and services provided with respect to the government’s investigation of the anthrax mailings. Plaintiff seeks $2,500,000.00 in damages. For the purposes of the motion to dismiss only, the defendant has accepted as trae the facts as alleged in the complaint.
In its motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Netstar-1 Government Consulting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Farhat v. Iran, the Islamic Republic ofDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024