Legal Opinion
Netstar-1 Government Consulting, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 2011No. 11-294CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge:
“No man can serve two masters.”2
Before the court, in this bid protest action, are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. At issue is whether a contracting officer’s delayed identification of a potential organizational conflict of interest, and subsequent efforts to mitigate that conflict, constituted agency conduct that was arbitrary, capricious and otherwise contrary to law. For the reasons that follow, the court answers this question in the affirmative. It GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the administrative record and…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- The McVey Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Inserso Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Reema Consulting Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Miles Construction, Llc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.