Legal Opinion

Rost v. F. H. Noble & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 16114. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Andrew Rost, as administrator of the estate of Joseph Zembrzuski, recovered a judgment for $3000 against F. H. Noble & Co. in an action on the case in the circuit court of Cook county for damages for the death of his intestate, which the Appellate Court affirmed, and the record is brought before us for review by a writ of certiorari awarded on the petition of the defendant in the trial court.

The declaration in two counts charged that the defendant on March 5, 1920, in Chicago, Illinois, was operating a factory, and a freight elevator operated by hand, and other machinery, viz., drilling,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walldren Express & Van Co. v. KrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. American Car & Foundry Co. v. ArmentrautIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hazel v. Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ware v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Rhoads v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. Pasquale v. Speed Products EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barthel v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API