Ehsani v. McCullough Family Partnership
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶[1 Under RAP 12.8, a trial court judgment debtor who has satisfied the judgment against him may be entitled to restitution following a successful appeal. However, such restitution is warranted only in “appropriate circumstances.”1 In accordance with the common law of restitution, as set forth in the Restatement of Restitution § 74 (1937), such circumstances do not include restitution from nonparties to the judgment, as was sought in this case. An attorney who receives funds into his client trust account, pursuant to a favorable trial court judgment, then disburses those funds as his client…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- SAC Downtown Ltd. Partnership v. KahnWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Gould v. McFallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST McKEANWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McKeanWashington Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davenport v. Washington Educ. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Miller v. Paul M. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Sloan v. HORIZON CREDIT UNIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Arzola v. Name Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.