Legal Opinion

Ehsani v. McCullough Family Partnership

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2007No. 78353-5PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶[1 Under RAP 12.8, a trial court judgment debtor who has satisfied the judgment against him may be entitled to restitution following a successful appeal. However, such restitution is warranted only in “appropriate circumstances.”1 In accordance with the common law of restitution, as set forth in the Restatement of Restitution § 74 (1937), such circumstances do not include restitution from nonparties to the judgment, as was sought in this case. An attorney who receives funds into his client trust account, pursuant to a favorable trial court judgment, then disburses those funds as his client…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. SAC Downtown Ltd. Partnership v. KahnWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gould v. McFallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. MATTER OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST McKEANWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McKeanWashington Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Washington Educ. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Miller v. Paul M. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Sloan v. HORIZON CREDIT UNIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. Arzola v. Name Intelligence, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API