Cummings v. Erickson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of thé superior court for Okanogan county, Neal, J., entered June 7, 1920, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for an accounting, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
What, from the pleadings, seems to be a Hyrcanian wood, becomes, after an investigation of the record, a three-cornered controversy involving an accounting. The appellant was a creditor of the respondents Erickson; part of his claim being secured by a mortgage, and part of it consisting of an open account. . The respondent Urban also claimed to be a *348creditor of the Ericksons, while the appellant contends that Urban and the Ericksons were partners in the conduct of a couple of farms in Okanogan county. The facts as found by the trial court '(and which our review of the testimony does not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Boyd & Co. v. Jones & PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Strickland v. HardieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Hobbs v. RaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
- Lyon v. BassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sainsbury v. Wapato Fruit & Cold Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Ellingsen v. Western Farmers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- National Bank v. BinghamMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Thrifty Supply Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Deverian Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Eddy v. Fern Hill Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.