Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Ray

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 26, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Trespass on the case foT false imprisonment. On demurrer to- the declaration and also on demurrer to a plea in abatement.

1Per curiam

We think the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration should be sustained.

The facts set out in the writ and declaration show a case for malicious prosecution, and not for false imprisonment; and these actions are quite distinct and different from each other. An action of trespass for false imprisonment, lies for an arrest, or some other similar act of the defendant, ‘ ‘ which, ” as is said, “upon the stating of it, is manifestly illegal;” while malicious prosecution, on the contrary, lies for a pros- edition, which, upon the stating of it is manifestly legal. Johnstone v. Sutton, 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colter v. LowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Turpin v. RemyIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Nebenzahl v. TownsendNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Powers v. CarvalhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Kittler v. KelschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Commonwealth Trust Co. v. CiriglianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Moody v. McElroySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  5. National Bank v. BinghamMontana Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API