Legal Opinion

Lindquist v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1997No. LUBA 96-055; CA A95229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s memorandum opinion affirming Clackamas County’s denial of his application to locate a residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use (nonfarm dwelling) in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.

ORS 215.284(1) provides:

“(1) In the Willamette Valley, a single-family residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use may be established, subject to approval of the [county] governing body or its designate, in any area zoned for exclusive farm use upon a finding that:
“(a) The dwelling or activities associated with the dwelling will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Nichols v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Collins v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API