Legal Opinion
Lindquist v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 29, 1997No. LUBA 96-055; CA A95229PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s memorandum opinion affirming Clackamas County’s denial of his application to locate a residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use (nonfarm dwelling) in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.
ORS 215.284(1) provides:
“(1) In the Willamette Valley, a single-family residential dwelling not provided in conjunction with farm use may be established, subject to approval of the [county] governing body or its designate, in any area zoned for exclusive farm use upon a finding that:
“(a) The dwelling or activities associated with the dwelling will…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Nichols v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Collins v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000