Legal Opinion

United States v. Virgil Allan Copus

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1997No. 95-6034PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.

Virgil Allan Copus was convicted of making a false statement to a bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. The district court sentenced him to a term of twenty-four months imprisonment, followed by twenty-four months of supervised release, and ordered him to pay restitution. He appeals his conviction and sentence. We affirm the conviction, but we remand for resentencing.

I

On April 8, 1987, Mr. Copus executed two notes to the Bank of Hydro (Hydro); one line of credit for $250,000 and one installment note for $50,000. Mr. Copus borrowed the money to finance his farming and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Kenneth E. HaddockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Alfred James SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Hector B. GermosenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. John J. PappertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Christopher A. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. HassebrockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API