Legal Opinion

State v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 27, 1978No. 49,364PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This is a direct appeal by defendant from a conviction for battery against a law enforcement officer, contrary to K.S.A. 21-3413. Defendant raises three issues on appeal, contending (1) that he did not make a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel; (2) that he did not sufficiently understand the charges against him to prepare a proper and adequate defense; and (3) that while a pro se defendant should not be allowed to waive a record, even if it is allowed the defendant here did not knowingly and intelligently do so. The case is before us on an agreed statement, no record of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. State v. BucklandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. State v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API